Galleries, Galleries

I’ve started to look a little into online galleries. I previously installed Gallery2 that had a huge number of features (most of which I did not know existed). And last night I installed ZenPhoto which does quite a bit less. The question is – what do I want?

Gallery2 has a lot of features. Users can “Add to Cart” photos they like, and buy prints immediately and easily off Shutterfly.com (which I’ve used for photobooks, but never for prints as it takes too long, compared with just going to Costco or Blacks). I don’t see any feature that kick-backs money to me for sending them to Shutterfly – but I guess it’s convenient for family members to just have it done.

ZenPhoto seems to have a lot less. My domain name web hosting site provides easy installation of apps where they handle all the maintenance (like upgrading and patches) and I just worry about the content. Call it free outsourcing. I tried it last night and I’m not convinced that Gallery2 should go away just yet.

The reason I’m looking is because Picasa and Flickr all have content limits of 1GB or so unless you pay. I already pay for a website with a gallery – so it makes sense to figure out how to create something usable.

So my business requirements are:

• Free or an inexpensive one-time charge to install
• Allow part or all of the website to be hidden from the public
• Integration with online photo labs (preferably in Canada like Blacks, Costco, Walmart or Loblaws)
• Referral bonus from those online photolabs, since I’m sending business their way (gallery2 apparently pockets the money to go toward development and only has two willing photo labs)
• Able to present photos on dark grey or black for optimum viewing
• Able to upload lots of jpegs all at once (a difficulty for Gallery2 sometimes)

Nice to Haves

• Plugin to upload directly from Picasa and/or Photoshop

 

UPDATE:

With the most recent trial version of Photoshop Elements 9, I can upload directly to smugmug.com – which for a yearly fee allows me to sell photos commercially, or just give clients access to a professional photolab at Costco prices. It saves them the trouble of uploading the large files, they get a decent price, and I can update them at will, with no upload limits. Clients can also get non-public access to the website galleries. Cost is $160 or so for the pro fee. My recent reading indicates Gallery2 is still a contender – it now integrates with a Pro photolab that now sends photographers a check each month if users buy their photos. Cool.

A Contract More Binding Than Rogers’

Yeah I’m talking about a wedding. Yesterday, my cousin chose to get married on a Sunday, on the beach with her now ex-boyfriend Dave. Imagine looking out onto a beautiful Lake Huron beach, devoid of fat, pasty-white tourists (E-coli scare) and only the blue waves cresting gently while boats slowly sailed across the horizon.

It was a beautiful day to be sure. I loved the chardonnay which surprised me – I’ve never seen Tobi drink a drop in my life. Her sister Jenn had assistants scouring the wedding for photos. They had far more expensive cameras and lenses than I. Knowing Tobi’s memories were in good hands, I took shots of the camera-women themselves: specifically Jenn laying flat on the main street of Kincardine photographing the couple casually walking down the street. Those driving were quite polite to stop. Mississaugans would not have been so kind.

For those of you keeping track, this would be the third daughter of Joyce and John Farrell to be wed. THe last is Tania who remains in the single scene, without a doubt the least neurotic of the Farrell sisters.

Just kidding Teresa/Tobi/Jenn. Please don’t hurt me.

Model Mayhem

No seriously, that’s the site: www.modelmayhem.com And no, it’s Not Safe For Work (NSFW).

It’s a Facebook for Fotographers except with only one millionth the functionality. If Facebook ever introduces multiple ‘faces’ (for example a professional banking face, a friend face, a family face and a professional photographer face) I don’t see any reason for this site at all. But it has widespread acceptance amongst models, touch up artist (TUA), make up artists (MUA), photographers and hair stylists.

So as an upcoming awesome photographer, I wanted to get my name out there. Especially for models in Mississauga who might need a creative genius to take their portrait. A few people jumped to be my friend right away. I think the idea is, if you’re a stylist or photographer, you want as many connections as possible. It’s like when you’re single: date enough people and eventually you’ll hit if off with someone. And yeah, if I need a Touch Up Artist or Make-Up Artist, I’d probably start with my friends list before searching elsewhere (especially when a TUA can be anywhere in the world).

It’s just another step forward in learning to make great portraits.

Double Exposure – Reality TV Just for Me

Ever since Survivor took America by storm, reality TV remains consistently on our TV sets. Sure there were attempts before (notably Cops) but putting beautiful dumb people together vying for $1 mil was a recipe for success… which was repeated over and over and over. Big Brother, The Bachelor/ette, and Who Wants to Marry a Millionaire all have appeared with various levels of longevity. My wife and I watch So You Think You Can Dance religiously – and now I’ve found another.

Ruth probably won’t watch this one though. Double Exposure is about two photographer business partners that arrange and take photos of celebrities and fashion models around the world aka every photographer’s dream. Mind bogglingly expensive equipment, interesting locations (the house where the Big Lebowski was filmed) and tonnes of assistants all come together in this reality TV show to create beauty. They make great images and I’m carefully watching each studio shoot to see what they do differently to make me that much better.

But like all reality TV shows, there is a bit of set up and overacting (the producer and female photographer have heart-to-heart conversation alone in a hotel room, with the documenting cameras filming everything straight on). The male photographer drove the business into bankruptcy with his purchases of mind bogglingly expensive equipment, location rentals and tonnes of assistants they need to pay.

They also yell at each other a lot. Sure it detracts from the photoshoots, but it’s still entertaining.

You Ruined the Wedding, You Ruiner!

Last summer I was a volunteer photographer at Scotiabank’s Wheelchair Challenge. There were a few other photographers there and for the most of the day, we each busied ourselves trying to capture interesting things that happened during the event. We did talk to each other before the event got started, something photographers do to gauge the other guys’ equipment/experience/skill. One guy called himself a wedding photographer and had just finished a wedding the day before.

We both had Nikon D50 cameras and so we briefly discussed how great they are (making ourselves feel good in the process). He talked about how he did a wedding session for X. Then he complained about his lens not being sharp – that it was “soft”. I mentioned that he should always shoot at least a third of a stop (f6.3 for my 55-200mm f4-5.6 lens) than the lens’ fastest aperture . He agreed he always tried to keep it at f6.3. But his lens was slower than mine. It was a Sigma 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 and he was shooting wide-open at 200mm. A guarantee for soft, subpar photos.

First – the lens isn’t a sharp lens – it’s a do-all lens that you sacrifice everything to have a lens that can vary between landscape, everyday shooting and medium telephoto photographs. Second – it’s Sigma – a third party lens that is okay but not awesome. Like buying no-name ice-cream. The quality just isn’t there. And last – he didn’t know his equipment or what its limits were. He didn’t know that he ought to have better equipment for what he was doing or how to make it work to its optimal level.

Weddings happen once (for the lucky people). The best way to remember them positively is to have beautiful photos of the happy bride and groom and anyone else who made the day more pleasant. Videos in my opinion, are too real and cause the actual memories to come flooding back. But I digress…

Even if he was volunteering to be the wedding photographer, everything about him reeked of an incompetent amateur. I don’t do weddings because I’m not awesome yet. I think I’d like to – and be paid – but until I can guarantee someone that I’ll nail enough digital moments to last their lifetime, they should hire someone better.

Only call me if the only person willing to do it is that guy. Then maybe.

Google Picassa Issues with RAW

It should be noted that Google Picassa is quite upfront about its method to convert RAW files here. The problem is, whenever it encounters a RAW file, it automatically converts it to JPG using its own optimal settings. Unfortunately, your camera will almost always do a better job converting to JPG then the automatic JPG converter in Picassa. I’ve noticed this as well, and my recommendation is to tell Picassa to ignore RAW files completely.

Use something like Adobe Camera Raw (found in Photoshop Elements) or a software that’s similar to convert to JPG on your computer, then export. It’s a pain in the ass for sure, but you shot RAW for a reason. If you wanted an automatic JPG converter, your camera is far, far better at it then the auto-Picassa converter.

If you *really* want to see your shots in Picassa the way they should, shoot RAW+JPEG (basic). It won’t really add much space to your already fat RAW files, and you can tell the difference quickly by comparing the JPG your camera created and Picassa’s attempt to know how well the automatic converter succeeded.

Photoshopping in Picasa

Photoshop is $700. Picasa is free. You definitely get your moneys worth – but for most of us Picasa is “good enough”. Welcome to my primer on how I can use Picasa in a pinch to clean up portraits at my local camera club shoots.

This is Picasa:

Example

This is some photographer during a test shot. My camera has a few dust spots (or hair) either on the lens or the sensor. The file was shot in JPG but RAW can be modified as well.

Crop using the first option in the “Basic Fixes”. Too much white space on either side of the subject.

Example 2

Straighten if your photo needs it. Just push the slider left or right. Little explanation is needed:

Straightening Example

Red-Eye Reduction: Picasa is pretty good at finding it – but portraits rarely need it when you’re not using on-camera flash.

Retouch: Use the Retouch command to get rid of any dust spots or wall blemishes that detract from the photo. It’s also a god-send for getting rid of acne, scars or even wrinkles. Don’t get carried away though or it’ll start to look like a cover of Cosmo. Click first where you want to get rid of the dust spot. Then click another part of the (clean) wall to clone/retouch. Don’t like freckles? Get rid of those as well. Zoom using the slider at the bottom.

Retouch Screenshot

After hitting Apply, you’re now looking at a photograph that can viewed by a client. A few other settings I can play with to give the photo a little more “pop”:

Add Highlights, Fill Light and shadows if you didn’t have the correct camera settings when you took the photo. Definitely something you should correct on-set when you have the lighting, but mistakes happen.

Also if your White-Balance is off, try finding something in the photo that should be white and setting that as your base. Select the Eye-dropper (under the Color Temperature slider) then select something that should be perfectly white. It should correct the colour balance. Otherwise just play with the “Colour Temperature” sliding it to the left or right if your photo looks to warm (orange) or cold (blue). On a portrait, the colour balance should be Flash and rarely am I fiddling with temperature.

 Tuning Screenshot

Otherwise I don’t touch the Effects menu in Picasa. To each his own though.